Over a month has passed since Rosneft, the Russian oil champion, signed an agreement with Exxon Mobil to jointly explore offshore fields in the South Kara and Black Seas. The deal effectively put an end to BP’s aspirations to explore the East Prinovozemelsky Blocks 1, 2 and 3 in the South Kara Sea, at least in the foreseeable future. Despite its under-the-radar announcement (in comparison to the announcement of the BP/Rosneft stock swap), the Exxon Mobil/Rosneft agreement received a great deal of attention. Many analysts and media outlets rushed to give their take on the deal. The commentary for the most part ran along the same routes as in mid-January (when BP and Rosneft signed their preliminary agreement): economics of Arctic oil, geo-political consequences of the “strategic alliance,” and environmental impact of the exploration and extraction.
Undoubtedly, the high costs of Arctic oil exploration and extraction, its potentially devastating effect on the environment, and Russia’s ambitions to remain the world’s energy superpower make this Arctic energy expedition a financially risky, politically charged, and environmentally controversial undertaking. Exxon Mobil pledged $3.2 billion for initial exploration, whereas Vladimir Putin noted that the Exxon Mobil/Rosneft alliance may lead to a total investment of $500 billion. Although the latter number may be highly speculative, the $3.2 billion pledged by Exxon Mobil is far more concrete, especially considering that the company had the world’s highest profit and third highest revenues in 2011. Thus, a legitimate question exists – why would a normally conservative oil company commit significant funds to plow into risky Arctic waters?
A partial answer may lie in the statement made by Exxon Mobil last week. The company said that it would be able to put the resources it finds in the Arctic and Black Seas on its books. The statement came as a surprise to many because Rosneft, and not Exxon/Mobil, holds the licenses to explore the license blocs. In addition, Exxon Mobil’s share in the joint venture with Rosneft amounts to 33 percent, with the Russian company holding the remaining 67 percent. Yet if the American oil giant is correct, Russian Arctic reserves could potentially boost the value of the company’s stock value (provided, the exploration is successful). Thus, Exxon Mobil shareholders may reap financial benefits from the company’s Arctic venture even before the company lifts its first barrel of oil from the South Kara Sea.
Sources:
http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/global500/2011/full_list/
http://af.reuters.com/article/commoditiesNews/idAFL5E7KG2P720110916?sp=true